OLD AGE IS NOT FOR SISSIES

NOTHING IN LIFE IS TO BE FEARED

  • Home
  • About
  • Family Life
    • Home and Garden
  • Travel
  • Genealogy
  • It’s Not For Sissies
    • Electronics & Technology
    • Opinion
  • Style & Beauty
    • Beauty
    • Style
  • Entertainment Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • TV
  • Following Old Trails
  • Great Florida Cattle Drive 2016
  • Palmetto Pioneers
  • Aches & Pains
  • Nutrition & Diet

Watch for The Book “Far Outside the Ordinary” to Become a Movie — A Book Review

September 22, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Books

I don’t know where to begin, except to say that I absolutely loved this book. It is a quick, captivating read. Whether or not you can relate to the situations in the book, you will still not be able to stop turning pages. You will love Prissy Elrod’s style of writing.

IMG_6429.PNG

Southerner Prissy Elrod, the author, is the steel magnolia in this story when she does what she has to do to save her husband, her family and herself. It has a fairy tail beginning and a fairy tail ending. It is what is in between though that tugs at your heart strings.

What many don’t know is that a magnolia blossom is very fragile, and the least little bump leaves a bruise that shows up almost the moment it happens. Prissy Elrod is a steel magnolia. She bruises, but she maintains her outward metal, and she survives. This book is her proof.

There is nothing ordinary about dealing with a loved one and their cancer diagnosis, but what Prissy Elrod did was ordinary. She did the best she could.

IMG_6428.JPG

What happens to her, though, is far outside the ordinary. There is a twist in the story that is never expected.

All of us who have been in her shoes found ourselves living each day one at a time and making decisions for which we were never prepared, all the while on a cacophony of emotions sweeping us along whether we were ready or not. She captures this in her memoir.

Expect a roller coaster of tears, desperation, persistence, laughter, zaniness, hope, heartache, heartbreak, humor, pain, anger, anguish, sorrow, hope lost, fear, compassion, frustration, and renewal. Sometimes, you will feel the bewildering and competing emotions all at once, like when I found myself laughing through my tears.

Elrod hurled me down into the darkness of despair when she reminded me of my own experiences in this realm, when the unintended consequences make us realize that the decisions were never easy. She tells her story so well.
.
Mostly, I was amazed by her candor and humility. Years ago my elderly great aunt who was a prolific reader told me that she was disappointed in the new books. She said that it was as if each younger author was simply trying to out-shock the last.

My aunt felt that contemporary literature was lacking in honesty, and that the stories seemed to be written for their ability to provoke massive fear, anxiety or disgust.

I wish she had lived long enough to read, “Far Outside the Ordinary,”. She would have loved this moving, honest account of a family’s tragedy and perseverance through adversity.

The book has small-town living, fashion, international travel, intrigue, shamans, shady medical clinics, a capitol city’s political high-society, tragedy, miracle treatments, love stories, and the uplifting love of family and friends. Elrod carried me for a ride through her life.

Though a memoir, it reads like southern fiction at its best. It reminded me of a cross between “Steel Magnolias” and “The Help”.

I hope she will continue writing, because she has a voice I would like to hear again. I also believe this would make a great movie. The characters are rich.

She did a great job of describing their uniqueness. I believe the characters will get her a movie deal in the end. They are zany, comical, quirky, and just what we have come to expect in southern movies.

So do yourself a favor and read this wonderful book before it becomes a movie!

How to Speed Clean A Room in 3 Minutes

September 21, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: It's Not For Sissies

Today, I read an article through Bloglovin called How to Speed Clean Your Home in 15 Minutes. This was an excellent article, and it included tips on quick cleaning that I have used for years.

Often, just before a party, I almost always run out of time. I have to stop working on the unrealistic list of what I would like to do and bring the house in for a landing.

I almost always bite off more than I can chew, so the massive flower arrangement I had planned for the piano becomes a group of framed pictures of family and a candelabra (something I already had.). And that new wreath I had planned for the front door becomes a seasonal wreath that I rotate year in and year out.

But the house itself is not ready, so this is why I put away the unrealistic list and do a speed clean throughout the house. I always try to leave myself about 30 minutes for this, but this speed cleaning article has made me rethink this. I should allow myself 45 minutes, because of the number of rooms in my house.

I already play music when I seriously clean. I love good old kick-ass country or classic rock and roll, so either works well for me. Music helps the time pass and keeps me moving.

Blake Shelton “The Boys Round Here”

IMG_6425-0.JPG

I use baskets; but only three, one for for each floor. I’ll expand that to one for each room. I store lots of baskets in the garage anyway, so I already have enough on hand.

IMG_6423.JPG
World Market

How do you speed clean your home? Do you have any new ideas for getting the job done faster? Please share!

IMG_6424.JPG

Oh Hey, Friday – Another Top 5 – Highlights of a Durango Vacation

September 13, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Travel

It has been another great week of vacationing in Colorado. Here are the top five things we did this week. September Farm’s “Oh Hey, Friday!” strikes again.

1. Fished Texas Hole below the Navajo Dam on the San Juan River just over the state line in New Mexico, These are big trout, and I had a blast. We were there from about 10 a.m. until 5 pm with a guide named Mark from Duranglers in Durango. I even took a 30 minute nap after lunch on a grassy bank next to the river while Harold and the guide continued to fish. Wonderful day on a Great Trout Stream!

IMG_5849.JPG

2. Found a beautiful scenic backroad between Durango and our borrowed house on 501 north of Bayfield, CO. It actually takes less time, too. The valleys and vistas are amazing on Colorado 240. We drove back when the sun was setting, which made the drive even more dramatic. Only problem was all the wildlife on the sides of the road. There were deer everywhere that evening.

3. Enjoyed a gin and tonic on the deck late one afternoon when an eight-point buck in velvet came to graze on the grass below. He stayed over a half hour. What a wonderful, peaceful moment.

IMG_5741.JPG

4. Hiked a new trail which followed Vallecito Creek in the San Juan National Park. The trail turns into rocky ledges which snake around outcroppings of rock over a 100 feet up off the running creek below. A couple of times a pesky thought entered my mind, “What if there were an earthquake”? Bye, bye cruel world! But still awesome sights to see!!

IMG_5851.JPG

5. Hung a hummingbird feeder, and before I got inside a hummingbird was already there feeding. Within a couple of days there were a half a dozen, some fighting to feed. I guess I need to purchase and hang another before they hurt each other.

IMG_5852.JPG

37.328229-107.594009

Oh Hey, Friday! Here’s My Top Five!

September 6, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Travel

This is in response to September Farm and Karli and her “Oh Hey, Friday”, where she asks her readers/bloggers to write up a little post about five things–anythings.

Harold and I are in Bayfield, Colorado, where we are living for a month. We just got here today, after driving all the way from Florida, stopping to sightsee and visit relatives along the way. We left Florida on August 23rd, so we took an extended car trip.

Here’s my five highlights as we crossed the southern states of Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, and New Mexico.

1. If you have never been to the Flora-Bama Lounge, you have missed the ultimate “beach bar”. Harold and I decided to drive coast roads on our way to Bayfield, and we stopped here about 4 pm on a Sunday for a true slice of Americana and a gin and tonic. Located on the Florida/Alabama state line on Perdido Key, in one hall there was an old classic country trio playing and singing. The female singer did Patsy Cline songs and was great. In another hall was a band doing southern rock. Downstairs in the open air bar was a third band. We left Perdido Key in Alabama by ferry crossing Mobile Bay and arriving in Dauphin Island, Alabama.

2. In Biloxi the coast road runs by the Hurricane Katrina Monument. We stopped to take a look. The memorial at 22 feet high is as tall as the storm surge that ravaged this beach city. In the glass case is a collage of items salvaged in the clean-up–a kid’s baseball trophy, a broken ship’s wheel, pieces of china, a weathered book, and hundreds more. On the black polished granite stone are etched names of the deceased. It is sobering, especially to those of us who live near the waters edge and have to contend with the possibility of one of these monstrous storms.

3. When we crossed the state line driving from Mississippi into Louisiana, we drove west on old US 90. This is a stretch of road that time forgot. There was hardly any traffic, and the road or bridges haven’t been repaired in a long time. We loved the old metal bridges, which reminded Harold and I of our childhood. This is truly a wonderful stretch of blue highway. By the way before interstates, US 90 was the ultimate highway for crossing the American south. It ran from Jacksonville, Florida all the way to Los Angeles, California.

4. Another stretch of highway that time forgot runs as close to the coast as you can get between Abbeville, Louisiana and Port Arthur, TX. It reminded us of crossing the Florida Everglades on the Tamiami Trail when we were young. Hardly any traffic, no homes, no stores, no gas stations, and very little room to even pull off the road, SR 82 is raised and runs between marshes until you get to a seaside oil town named Cameron, LA., which was ravaged by another hurricane. Then we crossed a major canal on a ferry, and the scenery changed to miles of cattle pastures on one side and beaches on the other side. We crossed into Texas just before Port Arthur, whose downtown is a ghost town, literally. By the way we googled to read about these areas. You won’t find any tourist signs for information. Remember these are areas that time has forgotten.

5. This is where we decided to turn north, because we are after all headed to Colorado. We love to see other state’s farming communities, so we headed across East Texas driving on their little roads that are marked “Farm Roads”. East Texas looks like central north Florida with rolling hills, oak trees, lots of pine forests, red clay and sand. Best stop though was Hemphill, TX with its NASA museum. This is the tiny town where the Shuttle Discovery’s debris came down, including the bodies of its seven astronauts. Their story is amazing, and it will touch your heart. This may be the best stop of our entire trip; this little town of about 5,000 people with its courthouse square and its amazing story about how a little town took care of 20,000 volunteers for 16 days.

Well, that’s my five! The drive took us a week, but we’re retired so what’s a week??

IMG_5244-1.JPG

37.28132-107.596381

Our Children and the Digital age

August 15, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Electronics & Technology, Family Life

I read an editorial in the June, 2014 edition of “Southern Living” magazine. It really made me ponder how hard it is to raise children today.

I thought it was hard raising my own during the late 80s and early 90s, but we didn’t have smart phones or instant messaging or twitter like parents have today.  I think my own mom had it the easiest.  Her biggest fear was the dreaded date to the drive-in movie.  That was one of my “thou shalt nots”, as in “thou shalt not go with your boyfriend to the drive-in movies.”  Of course, she didn’t say anything about the forests, corn fields, and cow pastures that surrounded our little rural community.

Teenager with a Cell Phone

My sister has teenagers, and one of them had to deal with a barrage of unkind Facebook comments from a friendship soured. It finally flamed out, but it made all of us realize how vulnerable these kids can be to social media.

Worried Teenager

Here is a link to the story that made me pause and contemplate this problem.

I’m glad my kids are adults, but I know my sister is having to deal with this electronic world everyday.  It is a world my kids or I didn’t have to deal with, but it is something my kids’ children will have to deal with soon enough.

Watch for this review! Coming soon! I can’t put this book down.

August 1, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Books

Far Out the Ordinary by Prissy Elrod: Book Review

I haven’t read a really good southern story in a long time–at least not one written like this.

Love this book! Will tell you about it soon!

Reblog: Food for Thought: from The Uncoordinated Mommy

July 31, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: It's Not For Sissies

This is a reblog from The Uncoordinated Mommy. It is the quest of a young mother who is concerned about her children’s food supply, and what she found when she took the time to dig a little deeper.

Here is the link; but I copied it below, too.

http://theuncoordinatedmommy.com/food-thought-sides-story/

Food For Thought – “Local Organic” vs. “Big Ag”
JULY 29, 2014 BY: TRACY KISTLER (THE UNCOORDINATED MOMMY)2 COMMENTS

While I have been embarking upon our quest for healthy foods I have been doing a lot of reading. One book I particularly found helpful was In Defense of Food , by Michael Pollan. I still believe this is a very good book to use when deciding to cut out processed foods. I think it will be easier for us as a family to cut as much out as possible and then slowly add in things that we feel comfortable with as we see fit. His rules are strict and all encompassing but easy to follow.

Recently while searching through Kindle to find some more stuff to read about food I ran across another book by Michael Pollan, The Omnivore’s Dilemma. This book goes into way more detail about where our food comes from and the different food systems in our country.

Before I go too much further I have a few caveats I need to share.

#1 I come from a pro agriculture family. I am from Florida, 9th generation, and while everyone thinks of beaches and tourism, agriculture is HUGE in Florida and not just because of oranges either. And my mother and step father are recently (a few months ago) retired pro agriculture lobbyists.

#2 When I research something for my family I look at both sides of the story. When Noah was a baby my go to resources were The Baby Book by Dr. Sears and Babywise. If you aren’t familiar these two parenting books couldn’t be from further ends of the spectrum. I try to fall somewhere in the middle and take a little from this and a little from that.

When I read the descriptions and rave reviews on amazon of The Omnivore’s Dilemma I started to wonder about the other side of the story. It all seemed a little one sided in the organic, cows are our furry friends, kind of way. So I clicked over to the one star reviews to check out those people who didn’t agree with what Pollan had written.

Wow.

There weren’t that many, but the one that I am including below, in its entirety, is amazing. If you want to hear what the other side (ag professionals) have to say, and you should if you want a well rounded view, then here it is. You can find a link to his comment and all 124 comments he received here.

The author is a 5th generation agriculturalist from Montana with a bachelor’s degree in agriculture education. His comment is anonymous, by Professional Aggie, and very enlightening.

As always, no matter which side you are on, you have to consider the source. I chose to share this persons point of view because there are TONS of books, like The Omnivore’s Dilemma, which tell the “Local Organic” point of view, but not so many nor as popular which tell the “Big Ag” point of view. I hope you find it as interesting as I did, no matter which side you are on.

All food systems are necessary in order to feed the world, December 12, 2009

by Professional Aggie

Wonderful title and overall the idea of organizing a book around the four main food systems in the United States is great. The truth is, for many, a trip to the grocery store has many dilemmas which must be faced. Pollan is an investigative journalist from Berkeley, CA and goes directly to the source of various ingredients to make a meal from each of the four food systems in the United States. He begins with going to a corn farm to help plant seed corn in the spring and follows the corn through various channels of processing and to a beef lot where the corn is used to finish a steer. The section on what he terms “Industrial Agriculture” ends with a meal from McDonald’s which he eats in his car. Pollan continues by exploring the “Big Organic” food system, a “Beyond Organic” food system which is the locally grown organic, and ends with the “Hunter – Gatherer” food system where he hunts and kills a wild hog and gathers mushrooms and other ingredients for a meal.

I purchased and read this book upon recommendation from a friend/co-worker who described it in a similar manner which I did above. My friend also added that Pollan takes a critical look at each of the four food systems, offering advantages and criticism of each. I thought to myself, this should be good; explore the food systems, take a critical look at each, the U.S. actually needs a book like this in order to be better informed consumers. My friend also asked me to read the book for a professional development opportunity which he was organizing for other teachers to participate in a review of this book. It is only fair to point out the fact that my colleague and friend who recommended the book is a high school English teacher who readily admits that he knows nothing about agriculture. For his sake I read the book cover to cover and dissected every detail.

Pollan is an outstanding creative writer and tells a great story. However, the journalism aspect of his writing (finding and reporting facts) are shoddy workmanship to say the least. Please allow me to qualify this statement, first with some of my credentials.

I am a fifth generation agriculturalist in this country and my roots in agriculture run even deeper when my family’s history is traced back to the time before immigration into the U.S. I was born into agriculture, thus I lay claim to all 35 years of my life as actual experience in agriculture. I earned a bachelor’s degree in agricultural education and have engaged in a great deal of additional professional training, reading, as well as travel to conferences & workshops, touring a wide variety of agricultural facilities, and networking with other agriculture professionals from around the world. I am a past state president of a professional agriculture organization and served a total of six years as a state officer of that organization. I have been published in a peer reviewed professional journal and have been invited to present professional workshops on several occasions throughout my career.
Today’s U.S. Agriculture is nothing short of awesome. Even with my extensive training in this field, I still learn new things every year that amaze me about our total agricultural food system. I have hundreds of resource books at my disposal; have travelled tens of thousands of miles to learn, tour, network, explore, and further educate myself about agriculture; I also have countless hours of real experience producing various crops and livestock, research, and learning. U.S. Agriculture is complex to say the least and it is feeble minded for anyone to believe that an investigative journalist (or any person for that matter) could even begin to scratch the surface of today’s global food system in one book that is 400+ pages in length.

I support the idea of all food systems. I do consume from each of them and feel strongly that all systems are necessary. What I do not support is the extreme use of rhetoric and false assumption used to market organic or local food to an ignorant public. Most readers would assume that Pollan reports the findings of his food systems investigation in great detail. However, the average U.S. citizen is three or more generations removed from the farm which makes them extremely vulnerable to misconceptions about agriculture. There is an assumption that food will always be in the grocery store and we believe we understand subjects which we actually do not; we fear the wrong things; and we do not fear the right things. Unfortunately many of the misconceptions about agriculture come from superficial reporting by media including this book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma.” As of today, there are 600 people who have written reviews of this book at Amazon.com, of which 528 rated the book at 4 stars or higher. I fully realize that I am in the minority here and I would also bet that I have more professional credentials and experience in agriculture than all 528 of those writers put together.

I paid money for this book based upon my friend’s recommendation expecting to read a balanced source regarding all of the different food systems. However, this book is far from balanced in its approach to each of the four food systems. Pollan chooses to demonizes the “industrial” agriculture system throughout the book. Big organic and hunter gatherer systems are closer to being critiqued fairly with pros and cons. The Local organic system receives nothing but praise throughout the book. There are several pieces of information which Pollan either missed during his investigation or he forgot to report to us in his book. Further, there are several pieces of information which he did print that simply are not true and of course there are those pieces which are factual but twisted out of context. I will give specific examples later in my review, but bearing these things in mind, I have to question whether Michael Pollan is even an expert in journalism due to his struggles with reporting the facts in the proper context. I already knew that he was not an expert in agriculture before I started to read the book. But after reading, I have to wonder whether or not he is even qualified to write a book on a subject as complex as agriculture.

As a fictional resource read for entertainment purposes only, I would give this book five stars. The American public would do well to gain its information from a variety of experts in a particular field (in this case agriculture) rather than only from investigative journalists who are really not experts at anything. If you have not heard the good news about American agriculture, then I content that you are not getting the right information and your information is coming from the wrong sources.

On the cover, the New York Times Book Review is quoted as saying “Thoughtful, engrossing . . . you’re not likely to get a better explanation of exactly where food comes from.” I would certainly beg to differ with this statement and would challenge readers to consider if the New York Times Book Review would know if they received a “better explanation of where food comes from?”

Why isn’t “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” endorsed by any sources with any credible expertise in agriculture?

Now a little about the very end of the book. Michael Pollan provides a very impressive 18 page inclusion of sources which he used in writing this text. As I reviewed the sources it became very apparent to me why his book leans toward the local organic food system and against the “industrial” food system. Well, how can we tell if a source is credible or not? Some questions which you should ask yourself to identify a credible source include:

1. What is the track record of an organization? (Some organizations have been predicting doom and gloom for decades and they have not been correct yet.)

2. By what authority are they making claims? (Many environmental groups or animal rights groups claim to have conducted scientific research, but do not have any Ph.D. scientists on their staff. Discredited individuals often bounce from position to position claiming their expertise, but their peers do not thing highly of their capability or credibility)

3. How long has this organization been in existence and what has been its purpose? (Groups surface overnight and make claims that cannot be substantiated, but the media report on it anyway.)

4. Who funds this group?

5. How important is creating a public uproar to their fundraising abilities? Actually, this is probably the most important question in the case of this book. Public uproar sells books, movies, and speaking engagements, all of which Michael Pollan has an extremely large vested interest.

For example, one of many reasons Pollan is against “industrial” corn in his book is the use of Atrazine as a pesticide as he claims on page 178 (which is in the “Big Organic” section, but he’s still ranting on and on about “industrial”) “that Atrazine has been shown to turn normal male frogs into hermaphrodites.” He cites his source as […] (Pesticide Action Network North America) – I visited the site today and found that they still make this claim – go to the site yourself and compare it against the questions I listed previously. Is PANNA really a source which we can call credible? Researchers have found that a parasite caused the mutation and in other peer-reviewed studies, scientists have not found any connection between agriculture and mutated frogs. Dr. Gene Larsen at the University of Minnesota made the discovery of parasites as the cause. Don’t take my word for it, go to the source and check it out for yourself – some of these sources have only been available since 1996 so I can certainly see how Pollan missed them (sarcasm). “Deformed frog mystery” by Sean Hanahan at […]. “Frog Population Declines and Malformations – is Atrazine a factor?” by Sherry Ford and Kay Carter at […]. You can even look at “White Paper on Potential Developmental Effects of Atrazine on Amphibians” by Thomas Steeger and Joseph Tietge at […].
I was disappointed that he either misinterpreted or chose to report facts out of context, one such example follows: Pollan is correct that Sec. of Ag. Earl Butz told farmers to do whatever they could to increase yield specifically “plant fence post to fence post.” He suggests that Butz wanted to “drive up agricultural yields in order to drive down the price of the industrial food chain’s raw materials.” (p. 103) This is a major hitch pin in Pollan’s argument against corn and its “industrial, surplus” nature. However, he is completely out of context – Butz told farmers to plant fence post to fence post in the early 1970′s after he and the grain companies of the U.S. negotiated the largest sale of grain to Russia – he told farmers this because they would be able to expect good prices due to the increased demand. The whole thing is documented in a book titled “Merchants of Grain” which Pollan cites in his resources, but he completely missed the mark in the context of his reporting.

Probably the most disappointing piece for me throughout the book is the drastic omission of facts. Of course he does this to make one system (“industrial Ag”) look terrible and another system (local organic) appear great.

Omissions of facts in conventional agriculture – He does this severely when discussing the feedlot situation with cattle and the feeding of corn. He chooses not to tell the reader about the forage or waste food processing products (almond hulls, carrot waste, soybean oil meal, tomato pomace, beet pulp, distiller’s grain, etc.) which are also fed to cattle in the feedlot in addition to the corn. He actually does a nice job on an elementary level of explaining the rumen function and bloat, however he does not tell the reader that each different feed requires a different bacteria to digest it. When feeds are changed too much too fast, cattle might not have enough of that bacteria in the rumen and thus will bloat. He further does not tell the reader that high heat also causes bloat. Or that alfalfa will also cause bloat if the cattle are not used to eating it (I’ve observed this happen) – Alfalfa would normally be considered OK as a grass-fed feedstuff. He goes on to explain that antibiotics are given to cattle, specifically Rumensin and Tylosin; however he leads the reader to believe that these products are given to all animals the entire time they are in the feedlot, which is completely false. Another fact that he missed is that Rumensin is not an antibiotic. If cattle have been already started on a feed ration which included corn then there is no need to give them Rumensin – if not, then the Rumensin is given only at the beginning of the feedlot period and then as necessary to promote bacteria growth in the rumen and to prevent coccidiosis (caused by the coccidia protozoa, NOT A BACTERIA). He is correct that the Tylosin is an anti-biotic, but he does not tell the reader that this is also given at the beginning and as needed to prevent the onset of disease caused by “stress” – shipping, change in environment, weather, handling, etc. He doesn’t tell you about the slim profit margin in finishing these cattle and that administering too much of any pharmaceutical for any reason will drastically cut into that profit margin. He doesn’t tell the reader that the reason why corn is fed to cattle is because it contains more energy than hay, is less bulky to store than hay, and can be stored year-round unlike fresh grass. He does suggest that all conventionally produced animals are “suffering” in some way, but does not mention that “suffering” animals do not produce or gain well to be economically sustainable.

In the section on corn, Pollan chooses not to tell the readers about precision agriculture, conservation tillage farming (the most sustainable farming system in history which cuts soil erosion by 90% and reduces energy use). He also does not tell us that erosion on cropland in the United States has been reduced by 40% (from 4 tons per acre to 2.6 tons per acre) since 1982. He talks about farm subsidies, but doesn’t tell the readers that less than 1% (more than 70% of which is nutrition assistance programs including WIC, Welfare, and School Lunch/Breakfast programs) of the federal budget goes to agriculture, yet agriculture accounts for nearly 20% of the Gross Domestic Product for the United States. He doesn’t tell the reader that farm subsidies protect us as consumers from monopolies producing our food which keeps our food affordable or that those subsidies help the individual farmer compete with cheap labor from other countries which keeps our food more local and safe. He further assumes that all conventional farms receive some sort of subsidy payment, which is also false. An underlying thought from Pollan regarding corn is that “food scientists and others are always trying to come up with new ways to gobble up the huge surplus.” When in fact the reality is that demand for corn has increased and farmers work hard to meet that demand – if in fact the surplus were as huge as he says, we would see much lower prices on that particular commodity. Of course this is not an exhaustive list of examples .

Michael Pollan attempts to indoctrinate the reader into believing that “cheap food” is expensive in terms of health problems such as obesity, type II diabetes, and heart disease. In fact, these diseases are quite expensive in terms of medical issues, but is it really fair to blame these issues only on the conventional agriculture system without also taking into account a lack of physical activity, portion sizes, frequency of eating, and genetics? Please keep in mind that “industrial” agriculture (I prefer to call it conventional) is everything that is not organic or hunted/gathered. Also, please keep in mind that ALL FOOD produced in the United States up until around World War II was produced organically. Is it possible to be healthy while eating only from the conventional food system? Is it possible to not be healthy while eating only from the organic food system? It is an undeniable fact that life expectancy has increased significantly in the United States over the last 100 years (47 years in 1909 to 77 years today).

Pollan omits facts about the organic production, making this method appear better than it is. He tells us on page 159 that “instead of toxic pesticides, insects are controlled by spraying approved organic agents such as rotenone, pyrethrum, and nicotine sulfate.” What he doesn’t tell us is that EVERYTHING is toxic at some level of exposure. He further chooses not to tell the reader that natural pesticides are not necessarily less toxic (some are less toxic, but many are more toxic) than synthetic pesticides. Specifically these pesticides which he gives examples of are actually more toxic than most synthetic pesticides – Copper Sulfate is highly toxic, shown to cause liver disease, and was recently banned in Europe; Rotenone is a nerve toxin which may cause Parkinson’s disease and the EPA is actually conducting a code red risk assessment for Rotenone to reconsider its registration (don’t worry, I didn’t get the press release about this either); and actually, Pyrethrum is a synthetic insecticide used by traditional agriculture and pyrethrin is the organic form – essentially these are the same compound with the same function, but pyrethrin comes from a natural plant source and breaks down more quickly in the environment which means that it has to be sprayed more often to be effective, thus kills more beneficial insects as a result and was recently listed by EPA as a likely human carcinogen. He also does not report that many of these organic products need to be (and are) applied several times or at higher rates to protect the targeted crops.

Further, because organic production cannot use herbicides to control weeds, many mechanically cultivate their crops to keep weeds under control leaving the soil surface unprotected and subject to increased soil erosion and moisture loss. He would really like us to believe that the only sustainable form of food production is organic, but he doesn’t tell us that with organic production yields decrease by 30 to 40 percent (the Danish government actually found even greater impacts than this as they considered a move to only organic production – they found it to be 47%). The first ever Census of Organic Agriculture was recently published and on some crops here in Montana yields were even lower than what the Danes found. For example, is the 17 bushels/acre average yield for organic barley sustainable when compared to the 52 bushels/acre average for conventional barley? That is a 67% reduction in yield. He also doesn’t tell us that to produce the necessary nitrogen to grow crops would require either conversion of 1/3 of all crop acreage into green manure production (usually legumes grown to be plowed into the soil) which would be on top of the 30-40% yield reduction OR to increase the number of cattle on the planet by 700% – Vaclav Smil professor of geography from the University of Manitoba made this calculation. The U.S. alone would have to raise 1 billion additional cattle to replace the nitrogen from commercial sources. Is this possible? We currently have 97 million head in the U.S. and globally there are 1.3 billion. If every square foot of private and public land including all parks, forests, wildlife refuges, golf courses, roadsides, and lawns were grazed by cattle there would still not be enough land to graze that many cattle in the United States. You can imagine the devastation to the environment that strictly organic production would have on our planet.

All food systems are necessary in order to feed the world, December 12, 2009

by Professional Aggie

Wonderful title and overall the idea of organizing a book around the four main food systems in the United States is great. The truth is, for many, a trip to the grocery store has many dilemmas which must be faced. Pollan is an investigative journalist from Berkeley, CA and goes directly to the source of various ingredients to make a meal from each of the four food systems in the United States. He begins with going to a corn farm to help plant seed corn in the spring and follows the corn through various channels of processing and to a beef lot where the corn is used to finish a steer. The section on what he terms “Industrial Agriculture” ends with a meal from McDonald’s which he eats in his car. Pollan continues by exploring the “Big Organic” food system, a “Beyond Organic” food system which is the locally grown organic, and ends with the “Hunter – Gatherer” food system where he hunts and kills a wild hog and gathers mushrooms and other ingredients for a meal.

I purchased and read this book upon recommendation from a friend/co-worker who described it in a similar manner which I did above. My friend also added that Pollan takes a critical look at each of the four food systems, offering advantages and criticism of each. I thought to myself, this should be good; explore the food systems, take a critical look at each, the U.S. actually needs a book like this in order to be better informed consumers. My friend also asked me to read the book for a professional development opportunity which he was organizing for other teachers to participate in a review of this book. It is only fair to point out the fact that my colleague and friend who recommended the book is a high school English teacher who readily admits that he knows nothing about agriculture. For his sake I read the book cover to cover and dissected every detail.

Pollan is an outstanding creative writer and tells a great story. However, the journalism aspect of his writing (finding and reporting facts) are shoddy workmanship to say the least. Please allow me to qualify this statement, first with some of my credentials.

I am a fifth generation agriculturalist in this country and my roots in agriculture run even deeper when my family’s history is traced back to the time before immigration into the U.S. I was born into agriculture, thus I lay claim to all 35 years of my life as actual experience in agriculture. I earned a bachelor’s degree in agricultural education and have engaged in a great deal of additional professional training, reading, as well as travel to conferences & workshops, touring a wide variety of agricultural facilities, and networking with other agriculture professionals from around the world. I am a past state president of a professional agriculture organization and served a total of six years as a state officer of that organization. I have been published in a peer reviewed professional journal and have been invited to present professional workshops on several occasions throughout my career.
Today’s U.S. Agriculture is nothing short of awesome. Even with my extensive training in this field, I still learn new things every year that amaze me about our total agricultural food system. I have hundreds of resource books at my disposal; have travelled tens of thousands of miles to learn, tour, network, explore, and further educate myself about agriculture; I also have countless hours of real experience producing various crops and livestock, research, and learning. U.S. Agriculture is complex to say the least and it is feeble minded for anyone to believe that an investigative journalist (or any person for that matter) could even begin to scratch the surface of today’s global food system in one book that is 400+ pages in length.

I support the idea of all food systems. I do consume from each of them and feel strongly that all systems are necessary. What I do not support is the extreme use of rhetoric and false assumption used to market organic or local food to an ignorant public. Most readers would assume that Pollan reports the findings of his food systems investigation in great detail. However, the average U.S. citizen is three or more generations removed from the farm which makes them extremely vulnerable to misconceptions about agriculture. There is an assumption that food will always be in the grocery store and we believe we understand subjects which we actually do not; we fear the wrong things; and we do not fear the right things. Unfortunately many of the misconceptions about agriculture come from superficial reporting by media including this book, “The Omnivore’s Dilemma.” As of today, there are 600 people who have written reviews of this book at Amazon.com, of which 528 rated the book at 4 stars or higher. I fully realize that I am in the minority here and I would also bet that I have more professional credentials and experience in agriculture than all 528 of those writers put together.

I paid money for this book based upon my friend’s recommendation expecting to read a balanced source regarding all of the different food systems. However, this book is far from balanced in its approach to each of the four food systems. Pollan chooses to demonizes the “industrial” agriculture system throughout the book. Big organic and hunter gatherer systems are closer to being critiqued fairly with pros and cons. The Local organic system receives nothing but praise throughout the book. There are several pieces of information which Pollan either missed during his investigation or he forgot to report to us in his book. Further, there are several pieces of information which he did print that simply are not true and of course there are those pieces which are factual but twisted out of context. I will give specific examples later in my review, but bearing these things in mind, I have to question whether Michael Pollan is even an expert in journalism due to his struggles with reporting the facts in the proper context. I already knew that he was not an expert in agriculture before I started to read the book. But after reading, I have to wonder whether or not he is even qualified to write a book on a subject as complex as agriculture.

As a fictional resource read for entertainment purposes only, I would give this book five stars. The American public would do well to gain its information from a variety of experts in a particular field (in this case agriculture) rather than only from investigative journalists who are really not experts at anything. If you have not heard the good news about American agriculture, then I content that you are not getting the right information and your information is coming from the wrong sources.

On the cover, the New York Times Book Review is quoted as saying “Thoughtful, engrossing . . . you’re not likely to get a better explanation of exactly where food comes from.” I would certainly beg to differ with this statement and would challenge readers to consider if the New York Times Book Review would know if they received a “better explanation of where food comes from?”

Why isn’t “The Omnivore’s Dilemma” endorsed by any sources with any credible expertise in agriculture?

Now a little about the very end of the book. Michael Pollan provides a very impressive 18 page inclusion of sources which he used in writing this text. As I reviewed the sources it became very apparent to me why his book leans toward the local organic food system and against the “industrial” food system. Well, how can we tell if a source is credible or not? Some questions which you should ask yourself to identify a credible source include:

1. What is the track record of an organization? (Some organizations have been predicting doom and gloom for decades and they have not been correct yet.)

2. By what authority are they making claims? (Many environmental groups or animal rights groups claim to have conducted scientific research, but do not have any Ph.D. scientists on their staff. Discredited individuals often bounce from position to position claiming their expertise, but their peers do not thing highly of their capability or credibility)

3. How long has this organization been in existence and what has been its purpose? (Groups surface overnight and make claims that cannot be substantiated, but the media report on it anyway.)

4. Who funds this group?

5. How important is creating a public uproar to their fundraising abilities? Actually, this is probably the most important question in the case of this book. Public uproar sells books, movies, and speaking engagements, all of which Michael Pollan has an extremely large vested interest.

For example, one of many reasons Pollan is against “industrial” corn in his book is the use of Atrazine as a pesticide as he claims on page 178 (which is in the “Big Organic” section, but he’s still ranting on and on about “industrial”) “that Atrazine has been shown to turn normal male frogs into hermaphrodites.” He cites his source as […] (Pesticide Action Network North America) – I visited the site today and found that they still make this claim – go to the site yourself and compare it against the questions I listed previously. Is PANNA really a source which we can call credible? Researchers have found that a parasite caused the mutation and in other peer-reviewed studies, scientists have not found any connection between agriculture and mutated frogs. Dr. Gene Larsen at the University of Minnesota made the discovery of parasites as the cause. Don’t take my word for it, go to the source and check it out for yourself – some of these sources have only been available since 1996 so I can certainly see how Pollan missed them (sarcasm). “Deformed frog mystery” by Sean Hanahan at […]. “Frog Population Declines and Malformations – is Atrazine a factor?” by Sherry Ford and Kay Carter at […]. You can even look at “White Paper on Potential Developmental Effects of Atrazine on Amphibians” by Thomas Steeger and Joseph Tietge at […].
I was disappointed that he either misinterpreted or chose to report facts out of context, one such example follows: Pollan is correct that Sec. of Ag. Earl Butz told farmers to do whatever they could to increase yield specifically “plant fence post to fence post.” He suggests that Butz wanted to “drive up agricultural yields in order to drive down the price of the industrial food chain’s raw materials.” (p. 103) This is a major hitch pin in Pollan’s argument against corn and its “industrial, surplus” nature. However, he is completely out of context – Butz told farmers to plant fence post to fence post in the early 1970′s after he and the grain companies of the U.S. negotiated the largest sale of grain to Russia – he told farmers this because they would be able to expect good prices due to the increased demand. The whole thing is documented in a book titled “Merchants of Grain” which Pollan cites in his resources, but he completely missed the mark in the context of his reporting.

Probably the most disappointing piece for me throughout the book is the drastic omission of facts. Of course he does this to make one system (“industrial Ag”) look terrible and another system (local organic) appear great.

Omissions of facts in conventional agriculture – He does this severely when discussing the feedlot situation with cattle and the feeding of corn. He chooses not to tell the reader about the forage or waste food processing products (almond hulls, carrot waste, soybean oil meal, tomato pomace, beet pulp, distiller’s grain, etc.) which are also fed to cattle in the feedlot in addition to the corn. He actually does a nice job on an elementary level of explaining the rumen function and bloat, however he does not tell the reader that each different feed requires a different bacteria to digest it. When feeds are changed too much too fast, cattle might not have enough of that bacteria in the rumen and thus will bloat. He further does not tell the reader that high heat also causes bloat. Or that alfalfa will also cause bloat if the cattle are not used to eating it (I’ve observed this happen) – Alfalfa would normally be considered OK as a grass-fed feedstuff. He goes on to explain that antibiotics are given to cattle, specifically Rumensin and Tylosin; however he leads the reader to believe that these products are given to all animals the entire time they are in the feedlot, which is completely false. Another fact that he missed is that Rumensin is not an antibiotic. If cattle have been already started on a feed ration which included corn then there is no need to give them Rumensin – if not, then the Rumensin is given only at the beginning of the feedlot period and then as necessary to promote bacteria growth in the rumen and to prevent coccidiosis (caused by the coccidia protozoa, NOT A BACTERIA). He is correct that the Tylosin is an anti-biotic, but he does not tell the reader that this is also given at the beginning and as needed to prevent the onset of disease caused by “stress” – shipping, change in environment, weather, handling, etc. He doesn’t tell you about the slim profit margin in finishing these cattle and that administering too much of any pharmaceutical for any reason will drastically cut into that profit margin. He doesn’t tell the reader that the reason why corn is fed to cattle is because it contains more energy than hay, is less bulky to store than hay, and can be stored year-round unlike fresh grass. He does suggest that all conventionally produced animals are “suffering” in some way, but does not mention that “suffering” animals do not produce or gain well to be economically sustainable.

In the section on corn, Pollan chooses not to tell the readers about precision agriculture, conservation tillage farming (the most sustainable farming system in history which cuts soil erosion by 90% and reduces energy use). He also does not tell us that erosion on cropland in the United States has been reduced by 40% (from 4 tons per acre to 2.6 tons per acre) since 1982. He talks about farm subsidies, but doesn’t tell the readers that less than 1% (more than 70% of which is nutrition assistance programs including WIC, Welfare, and School Lunch/Breakfast programs) of the federal budget goes to agriculture, yet agriculture accounts for nearly 20% of the Gross Domestic Product for the United States. He doesn’t tell the reader that farm subsidies protect us as consumers from monopolies producing our food which keeps our food affordable or that those subsidies help the individual farmer compete with cheap labor from other countries which keeps our food more local and safe. He further assumes that all conventional farms receive some sort of subsidy payment, which is also false. An underlying thought from Pollan regarding corn is that “food scientists and others are always trying to come up with new ways to gobble up the huge surplus.” When in fact the reality is that demand for corn has increased and farmers work hard to meet that demand – if in fact the surplus were as huge as he says, we would see much lower prices on that particular commodity. Of course this is not an exhaustive list of examples .

Michael Pollan attempts to indoctrinate the reader into believing that “cheap food” is expensive in terms of health problems such as obesity, type II diabetes, and heart disease. In fact, these diseases are quite expensive in terms of medical issues, but is it really fair to blame these issues only on the conventional agriculture system without also taking into account a lack of physical activity, portion sizes, frequency of eating, and genetics? Please keep in mind that “industrial” agriculture (I prefer to call it conventional) is everything that is not organic or hunted/gathered. Also, please keep in mind that ALL FOOD produced in the United States up until around World War II was produced organically. Is it possible to be healthy while eating only from the conventional food system? Is it possible to not be healthy while eating only from the organic food system? It is an undeniable fact that life expectancy has increased significantly in the United States over the last 100 years (47 years in 1909 to 77 years today).

Pollan omits facts about the organic production, making this method appear better than it is. He tells us on page 159 that “instead of toxic pesticides, insects are controlled by spraying approved organic agents such as rotenone, pyrethrum, and nicotine sulfate.” What he doesn’t tell us is that EVERYTHING is toxic at some level of exposure. He further chooses not to tell the reader that natural pesticides are not necessarily less toxic (some are less toxic, but many are more toxic) than synthetic pesticides. Specifically these pesticides which he gives examples of are actually more toxic than most synthetic pesticides – Copper Sulfate is highly toxic, shown to cause liver disease, and was recently banned in Europe; Rotenone is a nerve toxin which may cause Parkinson’s disease and the EPA is actually conducting a code red risk assessment for Rotenone to reconsider its registration (don’t worry, I didn’t get the press release about this either); and actually, Pyrethrum is a synthetic insecticide used by traditional agriculture and pyrethrin is the organic form – essentially these are the same compound with the same function, but pyrethrin comes from a natural plant source and breaks down more quickly in the environment which means that it has to be sprayed more often to be effective, thus kills more beneficial insects as a result and was recently listed by EPA as a likely human carcinogen. He also does not report that many of these organic products need to be (and are) applied several times or at higher rates to protect the targeted crops.

Further, because organic production cannot use herbicides to control weeds, many mechanically cultivate their crops to keep weeds under control leaving the soil surface unprotected and subject to increased soil erosion and moisture loss. He would really like us to believe that the only sustainable form of food production is organic, but he doesn’t tell us that with organic production yields decrease by 30 to 40 percent (the Danish government actually found even greater impacts than this as they considered a move to only organic production – they found it to be 47%). The first ever Census of Organic Agriculture was recently published and on some crops here in Montana yields were even lower than what the Danes found. For example, is the 17 bushels/acre average yield for organic barley sustainable when compared to the 52 bushels/acre average for conventional barley? That is a 67% reduction in yield. He also doesn’t tell us that to produce the necessary nitrogen to grow crops would require either conversion of 1/3 of all crop acreage into green manure production (usually legumes grown to be plowed into the soil) which would be on top of the 30-40% yield reduction OR to increase the number of cattle on the planet by 700% – Vaclav Smil professor of geography from the University of Manitoba made this calculation. The U.S. alone would have to raise 1 billion additional cattle to replace the nitrogen from commercial sources. Is this possible? We currently have 97 million head in the U.S. and globally there are 1.3 billion. If every square foot of private and public land including all parks, forests, wildlife refuges, golf courses, roadsides, and lawns were grazed by cattle there would still not be enough land to graze that many cattle in the United States. You can imagine the devastation to the environment that strictly organic production would have on our planet.

He also doesn’t tell us that manure is very bulky and thus expensive to handle when spreading onto crops. Earthbound farms uses 20-30 tons of composted manure per acre and their farm is 10,000 acres in size. How many more pounds of raw manure are required to make that much compost? Further, there is a real assumption that all nutrients are in manure in general for organic production, this is also false. If the nutrient is not in the soil it will not be in the feed; if the nutrient is not in the feed it will not be in the manure; if it’s not in the manure, it’s not getting back to the soil. Don’t get me wrong, the manure should get put back onto the soil, there is just no way that it can be our primary source of plant nutrition. Manure’s nutrient composition is also inconsistent throughout making it difficult to get the right nutrient in the right place in the field.

I wish that Pollan would have chosen to interview a farmer who is more advanced in his adoption and use of modern farming practices – George Naylor (“industrial corn farmer”) could probably be considered “advanced” when compared to 1980′s standards. If Pollan would have chosen to abandon his agenda and spend time with a modern 21st century U.S. farmer he would have found a producer who is on the cutting edge of technology and actually doing a better job of both producing higher yields and caring for the environment than ever before in history. Precision agriculture technology is simply amazing at using less synthetic fertilizer and pesticides by applying them only where they are needed.

The USDA has recently reported that 36 million people are hungry in America. These people are not worried about whether or not the food they purchase is organic or locally grown or if the chickens are “free range” or the meat is “hormone free”, etc. The bottom line is that we need all food systems in the United States to feed not only our country, but also to contribute to the world’s food supply.

World population is growing quickly and with population growth we lose land which can be used to produce food. How will we feed the world when the population increases to 10-12 billion? How will we feed all of their pets as well?? The only possible answer is that we have to get behind high yield agriculture in order to produce enough food – we truly need another green revolution. This has to be considered, and I fear that books such as this one actually get in the way of any meaningful dialect taking place in terms of world food production.

I like the idea of local food and believe it to be great for local economy and it also seems to provide great opportunities (business & hobby or both) for those who would like to farm small acreages. However, a definition of “local” is really necessary before any criticism of “industrial” agriculture is to take place. How far away is no longer considered local?? And what is “industrial agriculture” and what is not? As much as these terms are tossed around throughout the book, it is only fair they have a concrete definition rather than just a generalization that is used to throw the rest of us under the bus.

Other questions which Pollan chooses not to ask or answer in his book are:

What happens when we have a shortage of food production due to drought, disease, or other in some area of the country?

How do we obtain food items which we cannot or do not produce? I live in the Pacific Northwest in an area with a growing season of only 100 days. A recent study by agricultural experts from Washington State University suggests that local food actually ends up using more energy and not less.

What do we do with our surplus food production? For example: 70% of Montana is rangeland not suitable to cultivation. We have a comparative advantage over many places in the world for producing cattle and as a result there are approximately 3 cows for every person in our state (a small number when compared to the 6 million bison which used to roam the range up here belching methane into the atmosphere) – there are only so many that can stay here to be used locally. We are also the 5th largest wheat producer in the country. Our dry climate here is actually very good for producing high quality wheat and we are the only place in the world which grows five of the six different wheat classes. A great deal of our wheat is and has to be shipped out of Montana.

What about comparative advantages? Shouldn’t food be produced in the places of the world that are best suited to do so?

What about those fresh produce items which are not aesthetically or otherwise suitable to be sold as fresh produce but are great for a processed food product? Examples might be ketchup, soups, salad dressings, frozen concentrated orange juice, applesauce etc.

What about balance of trade for our country?

What about consumer choice?

What about consistency of food products?

What about the changes in the American family (demographics, structure, morals) and their eating habits? Most moms work outside the home. Many parents are divorced. Sitting down to eat a meal together on a regular basis is a lost art in many homes.

We are all very fortunate to live in the United States of America where we pay the least of any country for our food at less than 10% of our disposable income after taxes. Not only is our food the cheapest, but it is also the safest and most plentiful and provided in the greatest variety compared to anywhere in the world. If you’re going to cut down American agriculture, please keep in mind that you do have the option of living somewhere in the world other than the United States. When food becomes more expensive to the consumer, what industries and jobs which have been built because people have more money to spend should we get rid of? Ultimately the free market will make this decision. But, will it be tourism-related? Entertainment and recreation-related? Technology & computer related? Medical & health related? Automobile related? Real-estate related? Savings & investing related? Communications related? I’m just curious to know what people will cut out of their lives when more of their dollar has to be spent on food.

Please go to the experts in agriculture for information about agriculture. The following websites should be helpful to get you started:

American Farm Bureau Federation – be sure to order your copy of the Food and Farm Facts book. You’ll be amazed at how poorly Michael Pollan did at reporting on modern agriculture through his book – Keep in mind though, he’s only a journalist while the people compiling the facts booklet are experts in agriculture. […] and […].

Feedstuffs Food Link Connecting Farm to Fork at […].

Safe Food Inc. is a website put together by agricultural experts as a rebuttal to the movie Food Inc. […].

30.509807-84.297026

Villages Then & Now

July 31, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Family Life, This & That

I just read an article in the Huffington Post entitled “I Miss the Village” by Bunmi Laditan.  She misses the village that she never had where women worked side by side, telling stories, sharing their children and helping each other without having to be asked.  It is a good thought, but as I read her article another picture of a village kept getting in the way of this wonderful romantic notion.

I do a lot of genealogy, and my first thoughts were about those early ancestors of mine who migrated into Florida in the 1830s.  As I read the young woman’s romanticized description of how mothers would take care of each other and their children, I also thought about my fifth great grandmother who moved with her husband and family along with several of their older sons and their families.

They pushed back the briars, palmettos, native people and the jungle-like vegetation to plant their crops and build their homes.  Their homes were made of logs and their ceilings were high because hot air rises and that was what Florida was back then–hot, sweltering heat.

Log House

Florida Memory Photographic Collection

I remember my mother talking about how the older ones swept the sand around the outside of their home to the edge of the woods. Their yards were made of sand, and they swept it much like we rake our yards.  The sweeping served two purposes.  One was the threat of fire, which would strike from the pine woods after the frequent lightning storms.  The sandy barrier around the house gave them some sort of fire lane protection.  The other purpose was so you could see the tracks of a snake or other animal that had made it way under and sometimes into the house.

My fifth great grandmother’s husband died shortly after they moved here.  The probate papers had a doctor’s bill that showed where quinine and sulfa were used, so we’re fairly sure it was malaria or some other type of fever.   All of a sudden, she was alone in her home with the last of your children.  Thankfully, her sons and daughters were nearby with children of their own.   As a grandmother and a mother, there probably wasn’t much time for fresh bread and tea in the afternoons.

3db94d1b-d95e-4e69-bf86-e08a5d664558

My Great Great Grandmother

You see, women back then were pregnant from the time they married until they either stopped ovulating or died.

My grandmother’s mother died shortly after the fifth baby was born.  She hemorrhaged while standing over her newborn baby.  She was changing his diaper, and she started bleeding uncontrollably.  She died before they could get help.

Another third great grandfather died while the natives were trying to regain their lands.  There were reports in the territorial Tallahassee paper of many burnings and massacres in his area.  We have no proof he lost his life in one of these, but the probate began just after the massacres ended.  The massacres lasted for several weeks, where homes were burned, people were killed and crops were destroyed.  He must have died suddenly, because there were no doctor bills in his probate file.

I guess what I’m saying is that I don’t miss this village.   I am thankful that I had ancestors who were so strong willed and diligent, and that I didn’t have to do this.

The village in my past was a difficult place to live, raise children and survive.  I’m wondering if hers was probably not much better.

So instead, I’m hesitant to mention the shortcomings of life as we know it today, because what my ancestors lived through was nothing short of a miracle.  They survived.

a18b3b7e-c6fc-4749-b6f1-a2c4a033e056

My Great Great Grandparents and their adult children,

However, I still see Mrs. Laditan’s point; and I too would have liked to have had someone close by to help.

So let’s cut to the chase.  It would be wonderful if we could reach out more and help each other.   So what is keeping us apart?

I imagine that the very things that make our great state so livable now days are the same things that make us wrap ourselves into our own little cocoons of living space.

Air conditioning and television are two examples that come to mind.  We spend hours watching TV instead of visiting our neighbors.  We lock our doors and windows, and the world passes by.

To get the feeling of what it was like to raise children fifty years ago or more, turn off your TV, open your windows and send your kids outside.  That is what my mom did.

Children playing

Florida Memory Photographic Collection

But……..yes, I can hear you from here!   We wouldn’t do this.  Children have to be watched closely.  They cannot grow up on their own like we used to do.   And there is the safety issue.

Let’s face it.  Most of us live where we cannot let our children roam freely.

The village where I was raised and the one I raised my children in was exactly like that, except we did have air conditioning and TVs.  However, I was raised to get the kids out of the house, and I did.  The difference was where I lived.  Small towns are great places to raise kids.

Most people live in cities today, though; and the village we romanticize isn’t an option.  And that is a sad thought.

The Little Bird Said…Cheap Cheap Cheap….Let’s Talk About Moisturizers

July 30, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Beauty

Sometimes I like to just wear my moisturizer for the day. If I don’t plan to leave the house, I’ll apply moisturizer and give my face a needed break from the rest of my makeup routine, which includes another higher SPF creme.

In the past I used Estee Lauder’s Daywear Anti-oxidant Creme SPF15, but I have to admit that I really didn’t like paying $50 for 1.7 oz. I really do like its consistency, and I really do believe wearing an anti-oxidant with sunscreen is very important for my skin.

Moisturizer1

Last winter, though, I made a very good discovery when I ran out of my Daywear and had to make do with a drugstore brand. I found Lumene’s Bright Now Vitamin C Cream SPF15. It, too, is a daily moisturizer with built-in antioxidants and UV protection.

Moisturizer2

For my winter skin, I liked it even better than Daywear. It had a creamier consistency. My skin is drier in the winter, but best of all I bought it for less than $20. Now that is a savings, especially since it is 1.7 oz just like Daywear.

Summers in Florida are quite humid, so I’m back using my Estee Lauder Daywear; but this winter I will go use Lumene Bright Now Cream, again. Both formulas promise to protect against signs of aging and to safeguard my skin, but Lumene’s Bright Now keeps my face from drying out longer and I save $30.

I don’t know about you guys, but that’s a good deal! And all of you know how cheap I am.

I’m always looking for a good bargain. Any of you found one lately? If so, please share!

If I Wanted America to Fail…

July 20, 2014 by oldageisnotforsissies54 Filed Under: Opinion

Oh My!  I went back to see this video again to see how it played after the elections.

The last phrase touched me the most.  “If I wanted America to fail, I wouldn’t change a thing.”

Obviously, the general elections showed us that Americans are trying to make changes.  The next two years will be interesting to watch.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • …
  • 35
  • Next Page »

Subscribe To My Blog via Email

This is an invitation to come and play. Please join me as I travel the world, write a book, do genealogy, garden, take photos, and try my best to be a present wife, mother, and grandmother.

I try once a week to provide an update with insights and images. But don't hold me to the weekly updates, because life does get in the way. After all, I am retired.

So why are you waiting?

Go ahead! Subscribe! Enter Your Email Here!

Join Me on Facebook

Join Me on Facebook

Current Posts

I’m Back!

Glazed Ham with Applejack Fig Chutney

Winter Swimming in Iceland

The Most Voluminous Glacier in Europe

LINK TO MY RSS FEED

  • RSS - Posts
  • RSS - Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO MY BLOG VIA EMAIL. IT'S FREE!

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Copyright © 2022 · Swank WordPress Theme By, PDCD